Radioactive Waste Management Committee show pro-Nuclear colours
Dump N-waste on local tips, says watchdog
In March 1999, when the DETR proposed to retain the RSA's 400 Bq/Kg threshold for defining radioactive waste, we predicted that the nuclear lobby wouldn't take it lying down.
In September 6th 2000 the UK Government's advisers, the Radioactive Waste
Management Committee [composed largely of nukes] launched an attack 1 in support of the nukes.
There are two problems with the RWMAC approach:
If you are seeing this page full screen (i.e. without a navigation bar on the left) you can't see how the rest of the site is organised.
screamed the Guardian [Paul Brown: 6th Sept 2000]
They need laxer regulation to get rid of their mountains of contaminated waste.
... In its recent response to the Government's consultation on implementation
of the EU Revised Basic Safety Standards (BSS) Directive (Euratom 96/29),
RWMAC commented that: "RSA93 and its associated provisions are based on
dated science", and they "should be updated to ensure that they properly
reflect the nature of radioactivity and its hazards". In view of these sentiments,
RWMAC is disappointed that only minimal changes to RSA93 are intended as
a response to the requirements of the revised BSS Directive.
We reject this because the analysis which they say properly
reflect[s] the nature of radioactivity and its hazards is based purely on the physical characteristics of isotopes, not on their biological effects -- a fundamentally ignorant approach which lies at the heart of the underestimation of risk from polluting the environment.
References
This Home page link takes you to the index page, which has links to all the topics we discuss on the site [only use it if this page is full screen]
Send email to: SiteManager@llrc.org with questions or comments about this web site.
This page was last updated 10th June 2001