Compendium of evidence
2) Studies showing a risk not accounted
for by NRPB/ ICRP model
"Although adequate models are available for assessing doses
from intakes of many radionuclides, there remain areas for which the appropriateness of
current approaches needs further work. One such area is that of the non-uniformity of
deposition of radiation energy, especially that from alpha particles, low energy beta
particles, auger electrons and `hot particles' in cells and tissues. The uncertainties in
dosimetry associated with the non-uniform distribution of radiation energy within cells
and
tissues will be reviewed in order to determine the extent to which there is a need to
stimulate research into new approaches to assess the spatial patterns of radiation energy
deposited at the cellular and sub-cellular level."
The whole concept of absorbed dose, crucial to the present model of radiation risk, is under attack. Click here to see further criticism published in the European Radiation Protection Research newsletter, January 1999.
A senior official from the radiation protection section of the European Commission
recently (January 1999) told NRPB that it is no longer possible to talk in terms which equate doses from
radioactive discharges with doses from eating Brazil nuts.
What do brazil nuts have to do with it?
If you are seeing this page full screen (i.e. without a navigation bar on the left) you can't see how the rest of the site is organised.
"I'd be the last one to deny that there is substantial biological uncertainty regarding internal emitters, where that resides, and its relationship in terms of track lengths, and structure to target cells. This is probably one of the biggest uncertainties that we've got - in lung, in bone, more or less everywhere."
Dr Roger Cox, Head of Bio-Medical Effects Department, U. K. National Radiological Protection Board. (Busby 1998d)
Gunther Dietze describing remit of an action group dealing with "Dose and Effects in
Man".
Dr Dietze is Co-chairman and Co-ordinator of
"Environmental and Occupational Dosimetry:
an Integrated Approach to Radiation Protection Covering
Radioecology, Dosimetry and Biological Effects".
This is a Joint Concerted Action of EULEP, EURADOS and UIR
in the Nuclear Fission Safety Programme of the European Commission.(Dietze 1997)
See this link for cartoon illustrating the absorbed dose fallacy.
The EC says the remark (which LLRC's reporter noticed was not well received by NRPB)
was made as "a loose quote from a discussion at Sintra (Portugal) during a working group
session on the radioactive substances strategy at the OSPAR Interministerial meeting in
July 1998. The usual arguments were advanced about the negligible effects (in terms of
radiological effect on man) of discharges to sea. A delegate said that the discussion
should not be reduced to the level of brazil nuts."
The inference is that popular understanding of radiation biology has reached a pitch
where people won't be fobbed off with simplistic models.
The nuclear establishment always seeks to allay fears about their discharges by
comparing them with doses from eating brazil nuts or from taking a flight from London
to Tenerife twice a year. Brazil nuts are slightly radioactive because they grow on
monazite sands, which commonly contain about 6% thorium and 0.3% uranium (i.e.
alpha radiations). Flying at high altitude exposes you to a higher rate of irradiation from
cosmic rays (i.e. gamma radiation) than you get at the earth's surface.
These things are not risk free - especially if you work as an airline pilot or if your entire
diet is grown on monazite sands.
But the point is that direct comparisons between natural and artificial sources are
false; comparisons between alpha and gamma rays are questionable; comparisons
between internal and external radiation are a huge area of uncertainty.
Beral and Rooney 1993
internal contamination and prostate cancer
nuclear industry workers monitored for internal contamination have
a higher risk of prostatic cancer.
An earlier study (
Beral and Inskip 1985) had found an increased risk but no correlation with external
dose.
"Rooney and colleagues' study may be pivotal in highlighting the fact that certain internally decaying nuclides may enhance the risk. The increase in prostatic cancer in Wales is only one aspect of a general and unexplained increase in cancer in Wales between 1975 and 1987 (the last year for which data are available)." -- Busby 1994b letter to BMJ
Tamplin and Gofman 1970
Fallout and infant mortality.
Internal beta and gamma radiation at less than Natural Background:
mortality correlated with fallout levels.
Sternglass 1971,
1981
Fallout and infant mortality.
Increase in infant mortality and general morbidity had temporal and
spatial correlation with weapons test fallout.
Gould and Goldman 1991
USA weapons test fallout in downwind populations in USA.
Fallout had temporal and spatial correlations with cancer.
Bentham 1991
Perinatal mortality and Chernobyl fallout.
Temporal and spatial correlation
Busby 1996a Strontium-90 and infant death from congenital
heart defects in UK
Temporal correlation between infant mortality and Strontium-90 (Sr-90
deposition and Sr-90 in milk).
Busby 1995
Strontium-90 and cancer and infant
mortality in Wales.
Temporal and spatial correlation with Sr-90 deposition.
Bentham and Haynes 1995 leukaemia in high rainfall/
high fallout areas of UK.
Significant correlation
Dubrova, Jeffreys et al. 1996
inherited genetic mutation
Doubled rate of genetic mutation in children born 300km from Chernobyl
some years after the disaster
Dubrova, Jeffreys et al. 1997
Follow up confirming earlier findings.
NOTE: NRPB answers this (Clarke 1998) by irrelevant reference
to studies based on the Hiroshima study and control groups, which
were equally exposed to internal radiation.
Kazakov 1992,
Savchenko 1995
Thyroid cancer increases in Belarus after Chernobyl
The scale of thyroid cancer and the speed of onset after the disaster
were far greater than expected.
There is controversy about how doses have been estimated - they
have been revised upwards. It has been claimed that thyroid doses
were high because of an allegedly pre-existing iodine deficiency in
the region.
It has also been claimed that increased cancer registrations are due
to closer scrutiny, and that increasing cancer rates are due to social
disruption and radiophobia induced by the activities of anti-nuclear
scaremongers.
Merculova 1996
thyroid cancer Belarus
the greater part - 60% - of the children with thyroid cancer had very
low doses of radiation exposure.
The data actually show greater risk at the lowest dose.
Gould and Sternglass 1989
Infant mortality in USA after Chernobyl
Increased rates of infant mortality in all parts of USA showed correlations
with Iodine 131 in milk.
Gould and Goldman 1991
AIDs related death after Chernobyl
Post-Chernobyl mortality statistics in USA show damage to immune system
was a cause
Gould and Sternglass 1994
low birthweight
Correlation between Strontium-90 in bone and low birthweight
Gould Mangano and Sternglass 1996
neonatal hypothyroidism
associated with Iodine-131 in milk after Chernobyl
Busby and Scott-Cato 1997
leukaemia mortality in Berkshire and Oxfordshire
High death rate near nuclear sites
Dickinson 1997
leukaemia mortality in Berkshire and Oxfordshire
confirms existence of elevated risk in Berkshire and Oxfordshire found
by Busby and Scott-Cato 1997
Viel and Pobel 1995,
1997,
Leukaemia near Cap de la Hague
Childhood leukaemia up to 15-fold excess near Cap de la Hague.
Risk associated with frequency of visits to beach near and with eating
local seafood.
A new study by Guizard, Boutou et al.(June 2001) confirms the existence of the cluster, showing a six-fold incidence in the 10 kilometer ring nearest to the Cap de la Hague plant.
Black 1984 10-fold leukaemia cluster in Seascale
Seascale was massively contaminated in the 1950s with Plutonium
(Jones [BNFL] 1993) and Strontium-90
(Anon. 1960)
Heasman 1986
Six-fold leukaemia incidence at Dounreay
History of plutonium leaks
Beral Roman Bobrow 1993
childhood leukaemia near Aldermaston and Burghfield.
Case control study showing that the significant excess risk was in
those children whose fathers had been monitored for internal contamination.
Ziggel 1998
German leukaemia cluster
5-fold relative risk of leukaemia for children aged 0 - 4 living
within 5 km of Krummel nuclear power plant, N. Germany.
Elevated levels of chromosome aberrations in blood of local people
supports hypothesis that radiation is a cause of the leukaemias.
Cook-Mozzaffari 1989a leukaemia clusters near nuclear
sites.
An aggregated sample of populations near nuclear sites showed an increased
risk of leukaemia (age 0 - 24 yrs)
Roman 1993 Excess leukaemia which could be accounted for by a relationship with external dose.
Authors concluded that "... the possibility that it could be due to internal contamination by radioactive substances or some other exposure at work
should be pursued."
Other categories of evidence:
1) studies on which radiation protection standards are
based, and those which undermine them:
3) studies which are said to demonstrate that there is
no unappreciated risk but which have demonstrable flaws or which do,
in fact, show an excess risk.
4) animal studies.
References
Back to introduction
This Home page link takes you to the index page, which has links to all the topics we discuss on the site [only use it if this page is full screen]
Use the Health Effects of low level radiation button to see what else we have to say on this topic.
Send email to: SiteManager@llrc.org with questions or comments about this web site.