Witness for bomb test veterans wins disclosure battle with MoD
If you are seeing this page full screen (i.e. without a navigation bar on the left) you can't see how the rest of the site is organised.
Veterans of the British nuclear bomb tests in the 1950s (some ill, some dying) and the widows of some who are dead are demanding war pensions. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has always argued that radiation doses from the tests were too low to have caused any health problem. This opinion is based on film badges worn by service-men observing the test explosions. However, film badges can detect only gamma rays; they do not show exposure to beta and alpha emitting radioactivity from fallout. Since it is now known that internal contamination by alpha and beta emitters is, dose for dose, far more dangerous than gamma expert witness Chris Busby submitted a Freedom of Information request to the MoD to see what data they held on fallout levels. He had already come into possession of one such report. It showed that an area of Christmas Island 40 Km from the explosion site was heavily contaminated with Uranium - one of the radioactive substances that film badges cannot reveal.
The MoD revealed the existence of a substantial number of reports but refused to release them. They used a variety of excuses including the claim that they had no data on Christmas Island because it was an American test site. A Judge in the War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation Chamber has now ordered full disclosure.
A video of Professor Busby discussing the bizarre story of the MoD's refusal to release data under a Freedom of Information data request is on YouTube.
Click here to see the correspondence up to March 2010
Before you leave this page
MoD forgetfulness
Reported in the The Times, May 14th 2007, a spokesman for the UK Ministry of Defence said: “The MoD remains open to new scientific or medical evidence concerning nuclear test veterans. [But] previous independent reports have concluded that there is no evidence of excess illness or mortality among the veterans as a group that could be linked to their participation in the tests or exposure to radiation.”
MoD has forgotten a 2002 court case in which LLRC demolished the "independent reports" by showing the gross flaws in the epidemiology they rely on. See all the detail in Radioactive Times Vol 5 number 1, June 2003.
Poor memory, worse epidemiology
This Home page link takes you to the index page, which has links to all the topics we discuss on the site [only use it if this page is full screen]
Send email to: SiteManager@llrc.org with questions or comments about this web site.