The "Second Event" theory
Links to other pages detailing responses to publication
and further development of the theory
[in chronological order]
|
|
early reviews from around the world |
|
|
Discussion at a 1996 Symposium at the House of Commons |
|
|
ICRP labours under an illusion originally put about by NRPB |
|
|
revised calculations of the probability of the Two Event hazard |
|
|
NRPB's version of the theory in the International Journal of Radiation Biology |
|
|
Radioactive Times comments |
|
|
Busby's reply in IJRB |
|
|
and NRPB responds, conveniently ignoring the bit about hot particles. [those with an interest in DU should take note, as this is relevant to Uranium Oxide particles] |
If you are seeing this page full screen (i.e. without a navigation bar on the left) you can't see how the rest of the site is organised.
![]()
This Home page link takes you to the index page, which has links to all the topics we discuss on the site [only use it if this page is full screen]
Use the Flaws in NRPB / ICRP science link to see what else we have to say on this topic.
This page was last updated May 2001