LLRC banner


Dealing with the science since 1993

This page is new. We will review and republish material from the original site as resources allow. Meantime the old site can be seen in this new tab (please report any missing links)

George Monbiot, prostate cancer, and a Scientific Revolution

Prostate cancer used to be an old man's disease but George Monbiot has been diagnosed with it at the age of only 55. He wrote about it in The Guardian but did not refer to the role of radioactive fallout in causing the relentless rise of cancer. We discuss it here.
George has not been a friend to LLRC but we hope he makes a good recovery.

Welsh politicians licence French nuclear company to dump English radioactivity on Welsh Assembly's own doorstep
Hot particles coming to a beach near you

Electricité de France needs to remove 300,000 tonnes of sediment from the Severn Estuary before they can build the new Hinkley Point nuclear power station. They hold a Welsh Assembly government licence to dredge the sediment and dump it back into the water close to Cardiff. Tests by CEFAS for Natural Resources Wales, who approved the licence, are inadequate. Radioactivity is known to be present in the mud. It has come from nuclear power stations in Gloucestershire and Somerset, from Amersham International in Cardiff, from Sellafield, and from nuclear weapons tests. The gamma spectrometry CEFAS used for the tests cannot detect particles of Plutonium and Uranium.
LLRC supports calls for adequate testing or withdrawal of the dumping licence.

This image was created by exposing CR39 plastic to 0.1gramme of marine sediment for 20 hours. It shows radiation tracks from a particle - probably of Plutonium and about 1 micron diameter. This 0.1g sample contained another six particles. The sample came from the Esk, near Sellafield. UK Government reports since 1989 state that the Bristol Channel contains radioactivity from Sellafield.
Since 1965 Hinkley Point also has discharged particles; all nuclear reactor do. The CEFAS technique used is not capable of detecting them. When inhaled they are likely to be scavenged to lymph nodes. They deliver high doses of radiation to whatever body tissue they lodge in. Action points and reports, click here.

Lethal effects of fracking: new evidence of Uranium toxicity

The doubtful case for nuclear power and weapons is further damaged by new evidence on the effects of Uranium. A recent study in the Journal of Environmental Protection shows that babies born in fracking areas of Pennsylvania are up to 66% more likely to die before they are 28 days old, compared with the Pennsylvania state average. Uranium in ground water is thought to be the cause. More ..

UK Nuclear Test veterans' High Court appeal

In June last year the Low Level Radiation Campaign supported British ex-Servicemen who attended Atomic Weapons tests in the 1950s and '60s. We asked our public for financial help and met our target. We spent £22,000 on expenses for the legal team and bringing expert witnesses from UK, Ireland, Germany and Japan. Everyone on the veterans' team acted without pay.
Just before Christmas 2016 the Tribunal rejected the appeals. We have lodged a further appeal against the very unfair way the hearings were conducted.
Read on for more reporting and links to the most important court documents.
How we got here (archive)

Is nuclear power justified?

Under European law any "practice" that exposes people to ionising radiation must be "Justified". "Justification" means, for example, that a company planning to build a nuclear power station has to do a cost/benefit analysis. The benefits of each practice, including economic and social gains, must outweigh the radiation detriment. National governments must accept the Justification analysis before the proposal can go ahead.

European law also provides a way for the Justification to be reviewed if new and important evidence comes to light. Anyone can submit evidence and apply for a review. LLRC has already challenged the plan for a European Pressurised Reactor at Hinkley Point C - see this Ecologist article.

Read how you can make your own review application.

Why did the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission scrap a study of health risks near nuclear plants?

That was the question posed by the Los Angeles Daily News. Some NRC officials noted that, while several recent European reports show raised rates of cancer in children close to nuclear plant, there has been no health study of nuclear power in the US for almost 30 years. They wanted to revisit American data. They have been overruled. In this 12 minute radio interview Dr. Chris Busby explains that the new study was blocked because it would have revealed so much illness and death that the public would have demanded plant closures.

As part of our programme of updating the old website we have reviewed our responses to a gratuitous attack by George Monbiot in 2011.

LLRC's chief scientific advisor is Professor Chris Busby. His curriculum vitae

           DONATE             Follow @radsafer                        EMAIL                        ABOUT

Search this site